Advanced Applied Geology

Advanced Applied Geology

Determining the quantitative protection zone of water wells in alluvial unconfined aquifer

Authors
Amin Ahmadi 1
Seyed Yahya Mirzaee 2
Ghoramreza Mirzavand 1
Manouchehr Chitsazan 2
Arash Nadri 3
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran
2 Department of Geology, Earth Sciences Faculty, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Arizona Department of Water Resources, Phoenix, USA
10.22055/aag.2024.46034.2434
Abstract
The Quantitative Protection Zone (QnPZ) is an area around the well where water extraction is only allowed through that well. The QnPZ is important, but it does not have proper guidelines. This research explored possible criteria that have not been considered previously. This study was done in an unconfined alluvial aquifer using Modflow and Modpath models. The results showed that drawdown cones (DC) in these aquifers are asymmetric, and as the ratio of discharge (Di) to recharge (Re) increases, the drawdown in the influence zone (IZ) and also the size of the capture zone (CZ) will increase. It was found that the DC of each well will continue to expand until the water table (WT) becomes stable, and the IZ will eventually reach the boundaries of the aquifer. It was found that although the time to reach stability in the DC is long, the time to reach stability in the CZ is shorter. The results showed that both the radius of the IZ and the plan of the CZ cannot be a suitable basis for determining the QnPZ because their extent is very large and variable. It was found that assigning a circular area to each well, so that the volume of a small percentage of Re in that area is equal to the volume of the well Di, can be a suitable basis. However, determining the ratio of Di to Re requires subsidence studies and determining the allowable drawdown of the WT compared to the normal WT.
Keywords
Quantitative protection zone
Influence zone
Capture zone
Water wells
Alluvial unconfined aquifer
Subjects
Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S.Y., Nadri, A., 2022. The effects of aquifer and well parameters on Capture Zone and Discharge Zone in alluvial unconfined aquifers [Original Research]. Journal of Engineering Geology 16(2), 180-207. https://doi.org/10.22034/jeg.2023.16.2.1019241
Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S.Y., Nadri, A., 2023. The effects of influence radius and drawdown cone on the areas related to the protection of water wells. Journal of Hydrology 617, 129001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129001
Asghari Saraskanrood, S., Mohamadzadeh Shishegaran, M., 2023. Estimation of subsidence using radar interferometry technique and groundwater parameters and land use (Case study: Pakdasht plain). Advanced Applied Geology 13(1), 320-336.  DOI: 10.22055/aag.2021.38696.2251 
Azarma, Z., Mehrabib, H., Nadic, S., 2023. Investigating the Relationship between Subsidence and Groundwater Level Changes using InSAR Time Series Analysis (Isfahan Study Area). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards 11(4), 173-192.  DOI:10.22067/geoeh.2022.75774.1199
Bear, J., Jacobs, M., 1965. On the movement of water bodies injected into aquifers. Journal of Hydrology 3(1), 37-57.
Bresciani, E., Shandilya, R.N., Kang, P.K., Lee, S., 2020. Well radius of influence and radius of investigation: What exactly are they and how to estimate them? Journal of Hydrology 583, 124646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124646
Chatrsimab, Z., Alesheikh, A., Voosoghi, B., Behzadi, S., Modiri, M., 2021. Investigating the effect of aquifer type and groundwater level drop on subsidence rate using radar interference technique and field data (Case study: Tehran-Karaj-Shahriar aquifer area). Advanced Applied Geology 10(4), 683-689. DOI: 10.22055/AAG.2020.30557.2028 
Chitsazan, M., Nadri, A., Mizban, Y., 2018. Groundwater contamination modeling by municipal solid waste using MODPATH numerical code: Case Study in Lour Andimeshk Plain unconfined Aquifer, Khuzestan, Iran. Advanced Applied Geology 8(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.22055/aag.2019.24818.1826
Chu, S.T., 1994. Transient Radius of influence model. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 120(5), 964-969.
Cooper, J.R., H., Jacob, C.E., 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 27(4), 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR027i004p00526
Grubb, S., 1993. Analytical model for estimation of steady‐state capture zones of pumping wells in confined and unconfined aquifers. Groundwater 31(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00824.x
IGNSL, 2014. Capture-Zone-Delineation-Technical-Report (Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, Issue GNS Science Report 2013/57). www.gns.cri.nz
ITES, 2013. Guideline for determining the qualitative zone of groundwaters (Iran's technical and executive system, Issue 621). https://sama.mporg.ir/sites/publish/SitePages/Home.aspx
ITES, 2014. Guideline for determining the quantitative zone of wells and qanats (Iran's technical and executive system, Issue 419). https://sama.mporg.ir/sites/publish/SitePages/Home.aspx
Javandel, I., Tsang, C.F., 1986. Capture‐zone type curves: A tool for aquifer cleanup. Groundwater 24(5), 616-625.
Langevin, C.D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, S., Provost, A.M., 2017. Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 groundwater flow model (2328-7055). https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55
Louwyck, A., Vandenbohede, A., Libbrecht, D., Van Camp, M., Walraevens, K., 2022. The Radius of Influence Myth. Water 14(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020149
Moench, A.F., 1997. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer. Water Resources Research 33(6), 1397-1407. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00651
Motyka, J., d'Obyrn, K., 2022. The radius of influence of mine drainage – Definitions, methods of determination, and practical issues. Journal of Hydrology 613, 128422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128422
Nagheli, S., Samani, N., Barry, D.A., 2020. Capture zone models of a multi-well system in aquifers bounded with regular and irregular inflow boundaries. Journal of Hydrology X 7, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100053
Neuman, S.P., 1974. Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research 10(2), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i002p00303
Pollock, D., 2016. User Guide for MODPATH Verison 7–a Particle Tracking Model for MODFLOW. Open-file Report 2016–1086. US Geol Surv Washington, DC MODPATH, 7. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161086
Rahmani, G., Chitsazan, M., Ghafouri, H., 2022. Predicting water level drawdown and assessment of land subsidence in Damaneh-Daran Aquifer by combining numerical and analytical models. Advanced Applied Geology 12(2), 259-275. DOI: 10.22055/AAG.2021.36217.2190   
Rodriguez-Pretelin, A., Nowak, W., Morales-Casique, E., 2022. Optimization-based clustering of random fields for computationally efficient and goal-oriented uncertainty quantification: Concept and demonstration for delineation of wellhead protection areas in transient aquifers. Advances in Water Resources 162, 104146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104146
Samani, N., Zarei-Doudeji, S., 2015. A General Analytical Capture Zone model: A Tool for Groundwater Remediation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(1), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.065
Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 16(2), 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519
Thiem, G., 1906. Hydrologische Methoden: Leipzig, Germany. JM Gebhardt, P. 56.
UKEA, 2019. Manual for the production of Groundwater Source Protection Zones (U.K.Environment Agency, Issue Report March 2019). www.gov.uk/environment-agency
USEPA, 2008. Systematic approach for evaluation of capture zones at pump and treat systems (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Issue Report EPA/600/R-08/003). http://www.epa.gov/ada/
USGS, 1991. Description and evaluation of selected methods used to delineate wellhead-protection areas around public-supply wells near Mt. Hope, Kansas (U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Issue Report 90-4102). https://books.google.com/books?id=WlGITJCoakUC
Winston, R.B., 2019. ModelMuse Version 4: A graphical user interface for MODFLOW 6 [Report](2019-5036). (Scientific Investigations Report, Issue. U.S.G. Survey. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20195036
WRC, 2023. Guidance document on Protection Zones (Delineation and Protection). https://doi.org/www.wrc.org.za
Zeferino, J., Paiva, M., Carvalho, M.d.R., Carvalho, J.M., Almeida, C., 2022. Long Term Effectiveness of Wellhead Protection Areas. Water 14(7), 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071063
Zhai, Y., Cao, X., Jiang, Y., Sun, K., Hu, L., Teng, Y., Wang, J., Li, J., 2021. Further discussion on the influence radius of a pumping well: A parameter with little scientific and practical significance that can easily be misleading. Water 13(15), 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152050
Advanced Applied Geology
Volume 15, Issue 2
Summer 2025
Pages 39-67