Correlation between electrical resistivity and shear strength parameters in construction sites located in Lali city, Khuzestan Province, Iran

Author

Department of Geophysics, Masjed- Soleiman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Masjed- Soleiman, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Conventional methods for determining the geotechnical properties of the soil are usually costly, destructive and time-consuming. Electrical resistivity is one of the subsurface characteristics of soils that can easily be measured without any invasive action. It is very useful to develop an acceptable correlation between electrical resistivity and shear strength parameters in construction sites. In this study, a correlation was developed between the electrical resistivity and each of the parameters of cohesion and internal angle of friction, with laboratory measurements. Based on the regression analysis, there is a relatively strong correlation with the coefficient of 0.7769 between the electrical resistivity and the cohesion parameter. Regression analysis also shows a relatively good correlation between the electrical resistivity and the internal angle of friction parameter. The results showed that the electrical resistivity relationship with each of parameters of cohesion and internal angle of friction is linear
Keywords: Cohesion; Internal Angle of Friction; Correlation; Regression

Keywords


Alavi, M., 2004. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran, and its proforeland evolution. American Journal of Science 304, 1–20.
Berberian, M., King G.C.P., 1981. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 18, 210–265.
Braga, A., Malagutti, W., Dourado, J., Chang, H., 1999. Correlation of electrical resistivity and induced polarization data with geotechnical survey standard penetration test measurements. Journal of Environmental Engineering Geophysics 4,123–130.
Cosenza, P., Marmet, E., Rejiba, F., Jun Cui, Y., Tabbagh, A., Charlery, Y., 2006. Correlations between geotechnical and electrical data: a case study at Garchy in France. Journal of Applied Geophysic 60(3–4), 165–178.
Campbell, R.B., Bower, C.A., Richards, L.A., 1948. Change of electrical conductivity with temperature and the relation of osmotic pressure to electrical conductivity and ion concentration for soil extracts. Soil Science Society of America 13, 66-69.
Dahlin, T., 2001. The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computer and Geosciences 27, 1019–1029.
Kazmi, D., Qasim, S., Fahad Irfan Siddiqui, F.I., Azhar, S.B., 2016. Exploring the Relationship between Moisture Content and Electrical Resistivity for Sandy and Silty Soils. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 5 (6), 33-35.
Loke, M.H., 2016. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys.
Pozdnyakova, L., 1999. Electrical properties of soils. University of Wyoming, Laramie.
Pozdnyakova, L., Pozdnyakov, A., Zhang, R., 2001. Application of geophysical methods to evaluate hydrology and soil properties in urban areas. Urban Water 3(3), 205–216.
Pozdnyakova, A., Pozdnyakova, L., 2001. Electrical fields and soil properties. In: 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Thailand, 14–21 August 1558.
Samouelian, A., Cousin, I., Richard, G., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A., 2003. Electrical resistivity imaging for detecting soil cracking at the centimetric scale. Soil Science Society of American Journal 67(5), 1319–1326.
Syed B.S.O., Fikri M.N., Siddiqui F.I., 2011. Correlation of electrical resistivity with some soil parameters for the development of possible prediction of slope stability and bearing capacity of soil using electrical parameters. Pertanika Journal of Scirnce Technology 22, 139-152.
Siddiqui, F.I., Osman, S.B.A.S., 2012. Simple and multiple regression models for relationship between electrical resistivity and various soil properties for soil characterization. Environmental Earth Science 70, 259-267.
Sudha K., Israil M., Mittal S., Rai J., 2009. Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics 67(1), 74–79.