The effect of upper detachment level on structural geometry of the deep and surface Sargelan Anticline, Lurestan, West Zagros

Abstract

1-Introduction
The Zagros fold and thrust belt with NW–SE trend is located in the Alpine–Himalayan orogeny, resulting from the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic convergence between the Arabian and Eurasian plates (Berberian and King, 1981; Alavi, 1994). The northeastern boundary of this belt is the structural style, and sedimentary history divides the Main Zagros Reverse Fault into several structural zones. The Zagros fold and thrust belt can also be divided, along strike from east to west, into the Fars, Izeh, Dezful embayment and Lurestan zone. The Lurestan zone has a long history of hydrocarbon exploration, and production, and only a few wells have been successful. Seismic and well data in the area indicate that folding style has the primary role in the exploration and production of the hydrocarbon. Also, in this belt, thrust faults and detachment horizons have the main character in geometry and kinematics of the folded structures. The Sargelan anticline is one of the main folded structures in the Lurestan zone. So, in this research, deformational pattern and structural geometry of the Sargelan anticline have been studied using the interpretation of five 2D seismic profiles, drawing of structural cross-sections, drilling well data in the adjacent anticline and detailed analysis.
 
2-Methodology
The Zagros fold and thrust belt with NW–SE trend is located in the Alpine–Himalayan orogeny, resulting from the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic convergence between the Arabian and Eurasian plates (Berberian and King, 1981; Alavi, 1994). The northeastern boundary of this belt is the anticlines in the Lurestan zone host the hydrocarbon reserves in the west of Iran, hence are well-acknowledged regarding the style of folding and their response to appropriate detachment levels. This research indicates the results of a detailed study of the Sargelan anticline, based on field surveys, seismic profiles interpretation, well data, and drawing four structural cross-sections. We will successively focus on the upper (Amiran Formation) and middle (Garu Formation) detachment levels and deep-rooted thrust faults, causing the disharmonic folding beneath and above the upper detachment level restoration of each structural cross-section. At last, restoration of each structural cross-section obtained by a shortening percentage.
 
3-Results and discussion
Recent studies indicate that mechanical stratigraphy has the main role in folding style in the Lurestan zone (Casciello et al., 2009; Farzipur-Saein et al., 2009). In the study area, full upper detachment level causes a reduction in wavelength of overlying anticlines and formation of disharmonic folding. So, in this research four structural cross-sections (from SE to NW: AA´, BB´, CC´, DD´) across the Sargelan anticline has been drawn transecting the anticline from the NE to SW to illustrate the vertical variations in folding style. Interpretation of seismic profile indicates that along the AA´ section deep thrust fault has not formed in the southwest limb. Also, regarding the geometrical parameters and the drawing the folding stereograph, the axial trend of the Sargelan anticline is 115/0, and its axial plane is 030/86 degrees. The BB´ structural cross-section indicates that in the southern part of the deep Sargelan anticline, another anticline is formed, which is introduced as the South Sargelan anticline.  Along the South Sargelan anticline, a deep thrust fault rooted within the Garu Formation (middle detachment level) and cuts up-sections of the southern limb and flattens in the Amiran Formation (upper detachment level). In addition to the deep thrust fault, a low angle shallow thrust rooted within the upper detachment level (Amiran Formation) caused displacements and deformations in the post-Amiran formations. Along the CC´ cross-section, disharmonic folding caused the formation of the deep-seated Sargelan anticline beneath the surface syncline. The structure suggests that the deep-seated Sargelan anticline is formed along the s cross-section and continues to the north. The DD´ structural cross-section drew along the Sargelan, South Sargelan, Darreh-Baneh, and Chahar-Qaleh anticlines.
Along with this structural cross-section, the Sargelan and South Sargelan anticlines have formed between the upper and middle detachment levels. Therefore, the study of these four structural cross-sections indicates that the deep-seated Sargelan anticline continues more than about 10 km just beneath the surface syncline. The reason for the formation of disharmonic folding is the high thickness of the upper detachment level (Amiran Formation) in the study area. 
 
4- Conclusions
The interpretation of structural profiles indicates two upper (Amiran Formation) and middle (Garu Formation) detachment level. Detachment levels and thrust faults have a significant influence on the geometry and kinematics of the structures, as the southwest limb thrust has formed and begin to ramp. Displacement of this thrust transported the anticline upward, and so the Sargelan anticline is a transported detachment folding. The high thickness of the upper detachment level cased formation of disharmonic folding that the deep Sargelan anticline continues to the northwest more than about 10 km and beneath the surface syncline. Measurement of the geometrical parameters indicates that the Sargelan anticline is an asymmetric, cylindrical fold, and concerning the aspect ratio and bluntness is fold-wide and semi-circle respectively. Interpretation of seismic profiles indicates that a deeper anticline is formed parallel to the Sargelan anticline, under the upper detachment level and it is introduced as the South Sargelan anticline in this study.
 
References
Alavi, M., 1994. Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations. Tectonophysics 229, 211–238.
Berberian, M., King, G.C.P., 1981. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 18, 210–265.
Casciello, E., Verges, J., Saura, E., Casini, G., Fernandez, N., Blanc, E., Homke, S., Hunt, D.W., 2009. Fold patterns and multilayer rheology of the Lurestan Province, Zagros simply folded Belt (Iran). Journal of Geological Society 166, 947–959.
Farzipour-Saein, A., Yassaghi, A., Sherkati, S., Koyi, H., 2009. Basin evolution of the Lurestan
region in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt, Iran. Journal of Petroleum Geology 32, 5–19.

Keywords

Main Subjects


آقانباتی. ع؛ 1385، زمین شناسی ایران، سازمان زمین شناسی کشور، 586 صفحه.
شمس­زاده. ع، علوی. آ، ولی­نژاد. م، توکلی­یرکی. م؛ 1395، سبک چین­خوردگی و پیچیدگی­های ساختاری در زیرپهنه لرستان مرکزی (مطالعه­ی موردی یکی از میادین نفتی ناحیه)، ماهنامه علمی-ترویجی اکتشاف و تولید نفت و گاز، شماره 144، صفحه 53-48.
Agard, P. J., Omrani, L., Jolivet, H., White church, B., Vrielynck, W., Spakman, P., Monie, B., Meyer, Wortel, R., 2011, Zagros orogeny: A subduction-dominated process, Geol. Mag, Vol: 148, p: 692–725.
Alavi, M., 1994, Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations, Tectono physics, Vol: 229, p: 211–238.
Alavi, M., 2004, Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold–thrust belt of Iran and its pro foreland evolution, American Journal of Science, Vol: 304, p: 1–20.
Alavi, M., 2007, Structures of the Zagros fold and thrust belt in Iran. Am. J. Sci, Vol: 307, p: 1064–1095.
Allen, M., Jackson, J., Walker, R., 2004, Late Cenozoic reorganization of the Arabia-Eurasia collision and the comparison of short-term and long-term deformation rates, Tectonics, 23, TC2008, doi: 2010.1029/2003TC001530.
Berberian, M., 1995, Master "blind" thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics: Tectonophysics, Vol: 241, p: 193-224.
Berberian, M., King, G.C.P., 1981, Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol: 18, p: 210–265.
Blanc, E.J.P., Allen, M.B., Inger, S., Hassani, H. 2003, Structural styles in the Zagros Simple Folded Zone, Iran. Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol: 160, p: 401–412.
Bordenave, M. L., Hegre, J. A., 2005, The influence of tectonics on the entrapment of oil in the Dezful Embayment, Zagros Fold belt, Iran: Journal of Petroleum Geology, Vol: 28, p: 339-368.
Bulnes, M., Poblet, J., 1999. Estimating the detachment depth in cross sections involving detachment folds. Geology, Vol: 136, p: 395-412.
Carruba, S., Perotti, C.R., Buonaguro, R., Calabro, R., Carpi, R. Naini, M., 2006. Structural pattern of the Zagros foldand- thrust belt in the Dezful Embayment (SW Iran): Styles of continental contraction: Geological Society of America Special Paper, Vol: 414, p: 11–32.
Casciello, E., Vergés, J., Saura, E., Casini, G., Fernández, N., Blanc, E., Homke, S., Hunt, D.W., 2009, Fold patterns and multilayer rheology of the Lurestan Province, Zagros simply folded Belt (Iran). J. Geolog. Soc. 166, 947e959.
Colman-Sadd, S.P., 1978, Fold development in Zagros simply folded belt, Southwest Iran. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, Vol:62, No: 6b, p: 984-1003.
Dahlstrom, C. D., 1970, Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, Vol:18, No: 3, p: 332-406.
Dahlstrom, C.D.A., 1990,Geometric constraints derived from the law of conservation of volume and applied to evolutionary models for detachment folding. AAPG, Bulletin, Vol: 74, No: 3, p: 336-344.
Desitter, L.U., 1956, Structural geology. McGraw-Hill. London.
Falcon, N. L., 1961, Major earth-flexuring in the Zagros Mountains of south-west Iran. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, Vol: 117, No: 1-4, p: 367-376.
Falcon, N.L., 1974, Southern Iran: Zagros Mountains. In: Spencer, A.M. (ed.) Mesozoic–Cenozoic Orogenic Belts. Data for Orogenic Studies. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Vol: 4, p: 199–211.
Golonka, J., 2004, Plate tectonic evolution of the southern margin of Eurasia in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Tectonophysics, Vol: 381, p: 235-273.
Hessami, K., Koyi, H. A., Talbot, C. J., Tabasi, H., Shabanian, E., 2001, Progressive unconformities within an evolving foreland fold-and-thrust belt, Zagros Mountains: Geological Society, London, Vol: 158, p: 969-981.
Homke, S., Vergés, J., Garcés, M., Emami, H., Karpuz, R., 2004, Magnetostratigraphy of Miocene–Pliocene Zagros foreland deposits in the front of the Push-e Kush Arc (Lurestan Province, Iran): Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol: 225, p: 397– 410.
Homke, S., Vergés, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Sharp, I., Garcés, M., Goodarzi, M. H., 2009, Late Cretaceous–Paleocene formation of the proto–Zagros foreland basin, Lurestan Province, SW Iran. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol: 121, No: 7-8, p: 963-978.
James, G. A., Wynd, J. G., 1965, Stratigraphic Nomenclature of Iranian Oil Consortium Agreement Area: Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Vol: 49, p: 2182-2245.
Jamison, W.R., 1987, Geometric analysis of fold development in over thrust terranes. Journal of Structural Geology, Vol: 9, p: 207-219.
Koop, W. J., Stoneley, R., 1982, Subsidence history of the Middle East Zagros basin, Permian to Recent, in P. E. Kent, M. P. Bott, D. P. McKenzie, and C. A. William, eds., Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society London, Part A, Vol: 305, p: 149-168.
Macleod, J. H., 1970, Kabir Kuh geological map, 1:100 000. National Iranian Oil Company, Tehran.
McClay, K., 2011, Introduction to thrust fault-related folding, in K. McClay, J. Shaw, and J. Suppe, eds., Thrust fault-related folding: AAPG Memoir Vol: 94, p: 1 – 19.
McQuillan, H., 1991, The role of basement tectonics in the control of sedimentary facies, structural patterns and salt plug emplacements in the Zagros fold belt of Southwest Iran: Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, Vol: 5, p: 453-463.
Motiei, H., 1994, Stratigraphy of Zagros Geological Survey of Iran, 536 p.
Mouthereau, F., 2011, Timing of uplift in the Zagros belt/Iranian plateau and accommodation of late Cenozoic Arabia-Eurasia convergence, Geol. Mag, Vol: 148, p: 726–738.
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., Vergés, J., 2012, Building the Zagros collisional orogeny: Timing, strain distribution and the dynamics of Arabia/Eurasia convergence, Tectonophysics, Vol: 532, p: 27–60.
O’Brien, C. A.E., 1957, Salt diapirism in south Persia. Geol. Mijnbouw., Vol: 19, p: 357–376.
O’Brien, C.A.E., 1950, Tectonic problems of the oil belt of southwest Iran. In: 18th International Geological Congress, Proceedings, Great Britain.
Poblet J.A., McClay, K.R., 1996, Geometry and kinematics of single layer detachment folds, AAPG Bulletin, p: 1085-1109.
Poblet, J., McClay, K., Storti, F., Muñoz, J. A., 1997, Geometries of syntectonic sediments associated with single-layer detachment folds. Journal of Structural Geology, Vol: 19, No: 3-4, p: 369-381.
Rowan, M., 1997, Three-dimensional geometry and evolution of a segmented detachment fold, Mississippi Fan fold belt, Gulf of Mexico: Journal of Structural Geology, Special Issue on Fault-Related Folding, Vol: 19, p: 463-480.
Sepehr, M. Cosgrove, J.W., 2005, Role of the Kazerun Fault Zone in the formation and deformation of the Zagros Fold–Thrust Belt, Iran. Tectonics, 24, TC5005, doi: 5010.1029/2004TC001725.
Sepehr, M., Cosgrove, J.W., Moieni, M., 2006, The impact of cover rock rheology on the style of folding in the Zagros fold-thrust belt. Tectonophysics, Vol: 427, p: 265–281.
Setudehnia, A., 1978, The Mesozoic sequence in southwest Iran and adjacent area. Journal of Petroleum Geology, Vol: 1, p: 3–42.
Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J., Frizon de Lamotte, D., 2006, Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): new insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling. Tectonics 25, TC4007.
Sherkati, S., Molinaro, M., Frizon de Lamotte, D., Letouzey, J., 2005, Detachment folding in the Central and Eastern Zagros fold-belt (Iran): salt mobility, multiple detachments and late basement control: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol: 27, p: 1680-1696.
Soleimany, B., Sabat, F., 2010, Style and age of deformation in the NW Persian Gulf, Pet. Geosci, Vol: 16, p: 31–39.
Stöcklin, J., 1968, Salt Deposits of the Middle East: Geological Society of America Special Paper, Vol: 88, p: 158-181.
Suppe, J., Med wedeff, D. A., 1990, Geometry and kinematics of fault-propagation folding. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, Vol: 83, No: 3, p: 409-454.
Szabo, F., Kheradpir, A., 1978, Permian and triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south‐west Iran. Journal of Petroleum Geology, Vol: 1, No: 2, p: 57-82.
Takin, M., Akbari, Y., Macleod, J. H., 1970, Pul-e-Dukhtar geological map 1:100 000. National Iranian Oil Company, Tehran.
Vergés, J., Goodarzi, M.G.H., Emami, H., Karpuz, R., Efstathiou, J., Gillespie, P., 2011, Multiple Detachment Folding in Pusht-e Kuh Arc, Zagros: role of Mechanical Stratigraphy. AAPG Mem. 94, 69e94 (Chapter 4).
Vernant, P., et al. 2004, Contemporary crustal deformation and plate kinematics in Middle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and northern Iran, Geophys. J. Int., Vol: 157, p: 381–398.
Vita-Finzi, C., 2001, Neotectonics at the Arabian plate margins. Journal of Structural Geology, Vol: 23, No: 2, p: 521-530.